logo-xls

French Decorative Bookbinding - Seventeenth Century

Luc-Antoine Boyet - 1695


click to enlarge


(click on this image to see an enlargement)


Now we are going to proceed with some of the remaining spine panel details, As we dig even further into these high resolution photographs we discover that precision measurements are indispensable when it comes to comparing small imprints that may look the same but are not. First I want to tackle the border imprints that occupy the space between the corner imprints. In this case we see a pair of crossed wings, for convenience sake we can call them wings although they could be feathers or palm leaves. Whatever the case these were some of Boyet's favourite tools in this period, However as they are very small and hard to see without magnification, it may turn out, that Boyet had several examples of this particular motif but that will be hard to prove, hopefully, measurement will assist us. In this endeavour I have gone to great lengths to ensure that I have correctly scaled photographs.



click to enlarge


(click on this image to see an enlargement)


Comparative Diagram 1 - Resizing a high resolution photograph wih an overlay.



In Comparative Diagram 1, we see one of the many tests that was necessary to be absolutely certain of the true size of these imprints. in the lower part of this diagram we see a high resolution photograph that has been reduced to an approximately matching size of the 3600dpi scan that is above it. The scan has been overlayed with a transparent copy of the photograph that has also been color inverted to more readily distinguish it from the underlaying scan. On my first attempt, the photographed proved too large, then after a number of incremental changes, we finally see here, a closely matching overlay. This is 1.5 percent smaller than the approximately scaled photo. I should explain why this precision is important. You may have noticed on our home page, a detail from a Boyet dentelle, Here we see another example of Boyet's wings but are they the same? I must first warn you that this kind of comparative research cannot be done unless you have the binding in your hands, and a good camera and scanner. I should point out another thing in Comparative Diagram 1, it is an optical illusion that occasionally bedevils decorative bookbinding researchers. When you look at gold tooled imprints you are actually looking at gold that is not sitting on the surface but is rather sitting in the tough or indentation of the imprint below the surface, more often the eye sees the imprint in a 3 dimensional reversal, you do not see the trough unless you stare at the imprint too long, however in this overlay diagram the color inversion appears as an indentation. and strangely enough this is the true shape of the imprint.



click to enlarge


(click on this image to see an enlargement)


Comparative Diagram 2 - Boyet 1695 wings - scale diagram.



Comparative Diagram 2, is then the result of Comparative Diagram 1. Comparative Diagram 3 is another exercise to incrementally reduce a high resolution photo to the same size as a 3600dpi scan. These imprints are found on the relatively flat surface of the boards and thus a scanner will give you a much better result than if you try to scan the curved surface of a spine especailly a spine with raised bands. Still even so, this exercise shows, especially in the enlargement that your average flat bed scanner is not really scanning at 3600 dpi, or even 2400 dpi. A high resolution camera with a macro lens on the other hand can easily produce 4000 dpi results.



click to enlarge


(click on this image to see an enlargement)


Comparative Diagram 3 - Boyet wings 2



click to enlarge


(click on this image to see an enlargement)


Comparative Diagram 4 - Boyet imprints lab-wings (1695) vs lab-wings-2



Finally in Comparative Diagram 4 we are able to show both sets of Boyet's wings at the same scale. The reader will see immediately the problem, these two imprints are so similar in size and form that even at high resolutions it will be hard to spot a distinctive difference between them. However the overlay diagrams appear to show that the left side of the 1695 example is wider than its corresponding counterpart. After making these diagrams and tests I see that it will be rather futile to try to catalogue other examples of these wings without the advantage of having the specimens in my lab, however I am convinced that smaller less complex examples do exist.



Click here to see the next page...




click here to return to the HOME page.




click here to see an INDEX of the 2017 pages.

see below links to previous work






Atelier I B 31/10/2014





Icons of the Renaissance 06/02/2014





Atelier au trefle 22/12/2014




Atelier Royal 1518 - 1524 09/11/2014





Unraveling G. D. Hobson's book on fanfares 27/11/2014





16c fanfare on eBay 23/11/2014




another Padeloup binding on eBay 07/12/2014


the last Padeloup fanfare?


Rare Padeloup binding on eBay 15/11/2014



Pierre-Paul Dubuisson's work attributed to Derone le jeune 23/10/2014 (unfinished work now finished)


Pierre-Paul Dubuisson's work attributed to Douceur 22/10/2014 (an under contruction page finished at last)


Louis-Marie Michon - the 1956 Disaster 19/10/2014 (an unfinished page finished at last)


Louis XII Dolphins motif 03/02/2014


Aristophanes Binder 1543 02/02/2014


Atelier des reliures LOUIS XII - Atlas Catalan 12/01/2014


Atelier des reliures LOUIS XII - FRANÇOIS Ier - Linacre bindings 05/01/2014


Atelier des reliures LOUIS XII - FRANÇOIS Ier c. 1500-1520


Atelier des reliures LOUIS XII - FRANÇOIS Ier - Chronology 16/01/2014


Atelier des reliures LOUIS XII - FRANÇOIS Ier - Inventory - binding No. 29 19/01/2014


Atelier des reliures LOUIS XII - FRANÇOIS Ier - Inventory - binding No. 39 19/01/2014


Atelier des reliures LOUIS XII - FRANÇOIS Ier - The mysterious disappearance of François Tissard d'Amboise 23/01/2014


Atelier des reliures LOUIS XII - FRANÇOIS Ier - The Simon Vostre fiasco 18/01/2014


L'Atelier Simon Vostre 1486-1521 01/01/2014


L'Atelier de Pierre Roffet 1511-1533 - TOOL CATALOGUE 26/01/2014


L'Atelier de Pierre Roffet 1511-1533 27/12/2013


Pierre Roffet - fleur-de-lis binder 28/12/2013


Fleur-de-lis Binder 1525-1540 27/11/2013


Du Saix Master 02/12/2013


Atelier Étienne Roffet 1538-1549 12/12/2013


Atelier Jean Picard 1538-1547


Imitative Binder c.1540 15/12/2013


Salel Binder 1540 17/11/2013


Atelier Ruette 1606-1669 INVENTORY


Atelier Macé Ruette 1606-1644


Atelier du Maitre Doreur 1622-1638


Atelier Antoine Ruette 1638-1669


Atelier des Caumartin 1652-1715


Atelier de Charenton 1670-1685


Atelier Luc-Antoine Boyet 1685-1733


Atelier Antoine-Michel Padeloup. dit Le Jeune 1685-1758


Atelier Louis Douceur 1721-1769


Atelier Pierre-Paul Dubuisson 1746-1762


Atelier Nicolas-Denis Derome, dit Derome le Jeune 1761-1788


Atelier Jean-Pierre Jubert, 1771-1793?


Atelier MM binder, 1770-179-?





A word of Caution

Even experts are sometimes wrong, before you spend thousands on a book, please do your own research! Just because I say a certain binding can be attributed to le Maitre isn't any kind of guarantee, don't take my word for it, go a step further and get your own proof. In these pages I have provided you with a way of doing just that.

Virtual Bookings, created by L. A. Miller return to the Home page of VIRTUAL BOOKBINDINGS

l.a.miller@mail.pf